Friday, August 16, 2013

The Hard-Boiled Poker Radio Show, Episode 21: Lucille Ball

Years later, my podcast has returned! Episode 21 of The Hard-Boiled Poker Radio Show has now been posted. If you click over to the show’s blog you can see the entry with my “show notes.” You can download the show there (or just listen to it online), or you can just click here. It ought to be turning up in iTunes as well before too long, I imagine. (All of the previous 20 episodes are still there.)

This episode features the great Lucille Ball and includes some stories about her and Desi Arnaz, a full episode of an old time radio show in which she starred, as well as a couple of funny poker-related excerpts from I Love Lucy. There’s also a pretty humorous (and catchy) song from the Andrews Sisters in there, too, called “Strip Polka.”

I started the podcast with great enthusiasm long ago, pumping out episodes every two weeks or so there at the beginning, then slowing down the pace but still getting all of the way to Episode 20 fairly quickly. Then a few months passed, I claimed the show was on “hiatus,” and before long it became clear I was drawing thin to ever revive the sucker.

Not really sure what exactly inspired me finally to pull together a new episode this week, other than having a little bit of free time in between tourney trips and other obligations.

I actually had ideas for new episodes on multiple occasions over that long period of procrastination, even recording segments and pursuing themes on a couple of occasions. Once my buddy the Poker Grump and I even recorded a conversation about A Streetcar Named Desire that I’d intended to use in an episode, but I never got around to bringing that idea to fruition.

We’d both written posts about the movie, which in fact incorporates poker in fairly significant ways. Incidentally, here’s his post about the film, titled “Poker, ‘this party of apes,’” and here’s mine, “Men, Women, and Poker in A Streetcar Named Desire.” We both discuss how the film uses poker as a context for exploring the movie’s broader themes regarding men and women and cultural expectations or “gender roles” for each.

That same topic actually comes up in the old time radio show I highlight in Episode 21, an episode of My Favorite Husband. As I explain on the podcast, the radio show which ran from 1948 to 1951 featured the same sort of situation that would later get picked up and used for the I Love Lucy show that premiered in 1951 -- that is, a domestic setting with Ball starring as a housewife and getting into funny situations with her working husband. In fact, the TV show even borrowed some of the plots from the radio show, including the one I play on the podcast.

As you might have guessed, the episode finds Lucy -- on the radio show playing a character named Liz Cooper -- jumping into her husband’s poker game, a men-only sphere in which her presence creates some conflict. However, unlike in A Streetcar Named Desire, the result of the conflict are lots of laughs and no tense-filled drama.

Anyhow, check out the show if you’re curious. Despite all the time passing, I basically made the episode without any significant change to the format and without even making too much of a deal of having let so much time go by between shows. The idea for the podcast all along has been to create shows that weren’t time-bound in any way, meaning you could listen to them at any time and they’d still make sense and be as interesting or entertaining as when they were first created.

If you do happen to listen, I’d love feedback either here on this post, over on the post on the HBPRS blog, or via reviews in iTunes. Would also like suggestions, too, for future shows, if anyone’s got ’em.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, March 01, 2013

Men, Women, and Poker in A Streetcar Named Desire

A Streetcar Named Desire, directed by Elia Kazan and adapted from Tennessee Williams’s award-winning play, first premiered in 1951. A gripping domestic drama filled with sex and violence, the story presents a most interesting use of poker as both a plot device and a means to emphasize one of the film’s themes, namely, the stark, conflict-causing differences that can sometimes exist between men and women.

One scene in particular, coming relatively early in the film, well demonstrates how poker was thought of not only as a game for men, but also a ready context in which men could fulfill cultural expectations about masculinity.

The scene -- referred to as “The Poker Night” in Williams’s play -- comes about a half-hour in, by which point we’ve already gotten to know the story’s three primary figures, Stanley Kowalski (played by Marlon Brando in the film), his wife Stella (Kim Hunter), and her sister Blanche (Vivien Leigh). By then we’ve also come to recognize some of the effects caused by Blanche coming to New Orleans to stay with the young couple.

In a way, Blanche moving into their small apartment near the French Quarter instantly draws attention to several differences that exist between her vulnerable, newly pregnant sister and the callous, muscle-bound Stanley, a WWII vet turned factory worker. Stella, like Blanche, hails from rural Mississippi, much different from the gritty urban setting in which Stanley seems comfortable. There is also a class conflict of sorts going on, with Stanley’s modest upbringing clashing with the (now lost) aristocratic heritage of the DuBois family.

The most prominent conflict in the film, however, is the one ongoing between men and women, something Blanche’s upsetting the balance of in the Kowalski household certainly brings to light. And poker night -- happening shortly after Blanche’s arrival -- particularly underscores the contrast between the sexes the film intends to convey.

During the afternoon before the game, Blanche says to Stanley “I understand there’s to be a little card party here tonight, to which we ladies are cordially not invited.” “That’s right,” answers Stanley, wasting no words. It’s obvious that the game represents something wholly off-limits to the women. In fact, Stanley’s response suggests even talking about the game with Blanche is inappropriate.

Stella understands the need for the men to be alone, and thus plans to take Blanche out for the evening. Before they leave, however, Blanche attempts a bit of flirting with Stanley, and when he resists Blanche responds with a back-handed compliment.

“I can’t imagine any witch of a woman casting a spell over you,” she says. “That’s right,” says Stanley, repeating his same terse reply from before. Undeterred, Blanche continues. “You’re simple, straightforward, and honest. A little bit on the... uh... primitive side, I should say. The way to proceed a woman would have to...”

“She would have to lay her cards on the table,” Stanley says, abruptly halting her with a poker metaphor. Some shouting ensues, and their conversation-slash-argument ends without much resolution.

Cut to later that night. In the play, Williams’s stage directions unmistakably reveal his intention for the poker game to highlight the players’ masculinity. Explaining how each of the actors are to wear colored shirts, Williams notes “they are men at the peak of their physical manhood, as coarse and direct and powerful as the primary colors” they are sporting.

While we can’t see the colors of the men’s shirts in the black-and-while film (co-scripted by Williams), we can certainly appreciate the other masculine notes being loudly sounded in the scene.

It is upon the ladies’ return that we first glimpse the game, now many hours old. The men are drinking and smoking cigars, the room darkly lit and claustrophobic-seeming. From upstairs comes banging and yelling from the wife of one of the players, impatient with the noise the men are making and wishing for the game to end.

Stella and Blanche hover over the game momentarily while a hand being is dealt. Blanche even goes so far as to lean forward and peek at one of the player’s cards. “Poker’s so fascinating!” she says. “Could I kibbitz?” “You could not!” angrily yells Stanley -- who, not incidentally, has been losing -- and he soon suggests the women should leave.

“How much longer is this game going to continue?” asks Stella. “Until we get ready to quit!” responds Stanley, giving his wife an aggressive slap on the backside when she is slow to exit.

The game continues while the women move to the neighboring room, the card playing having literally segregated the sexes. The sisters start to make noise, laughing and playing the radio, prompting Stanley -- not unlike the wife upstairs -- to yell across for them to keep quiet.

Eventually one of the players, Mitch (Karl Malden), leaves the game momentarily to talk with Blanche, with whom he’s instantly enchanted. Meanwhile, the poker continues, with Stanley announcing Spit-in-the-Ocean once it is his turn to call the game.

Blanche eventually has the radio back on and begins dancing for Mitch. Meanwhile in the other room, a hand is concluding. “Three bullets, mustache,” says Stanley to Pablo as he reaches for the money in the middle. “A straight, I gotcha!” yells back Pablo with a greedy grin as he grabs Stanley’s arm.

Incensed, Stanley gets up and races into the next room. There he grabs the radio and shockingly throws it through a closed window, the glass shattering in a loud explosion.

Stella responds in kind, rushing into the room where the men are sitting and pushing one of the players, the light above the table breaking in the process. An enraged Stanley then begins to beat his pregnant wife, the attack only ending when one of the men knocks him unconscious.

“We should not be playing in a house with women!” Mitch yells out amid the fracas, a line he repeats when Stanley, after finally coming to, throws everyone out. The scene ends with a disoriented Stanley alone yelling for Stella who has taken refuge upstairs -- the iconic “Stella!” scene everyone remembers from the film. Stella forgives him -- this time -- and comes back down.

There are a few possible reasons for Stanley’s outburst, including his well-founded suspicions that Blanche’s story about “losing” the DuBois family estate and being on a leave of absence from her job as a school teacher is untruthful. Such is an issue that will become more significant later in the film when her seduction of Mitch has further progressed.

But really here Stanley seems most upset at how the poker game -- an arena for men to be men, perhaps not unlike the war from which he’s recently returned -- has been disturbed. It is almost as though that “manhood” Williams describes the players possessing has been somehow threatened or at least compromised by the women’s intrusion.

Later Blanche talks to her sister about Stanley, calling him an “animal” and “subhuman.” Poker, too, becomes part of her argument when she refers to “poker night” as “his party of apes.” Blanche, arguing for the arts and other refinements, tries to convince Stella that she shouldn’t stay with Stanley and thus “hang back with the brutes,” but her argument isn’t working.

Those familiar with A Streetcar Named Desire know things do not turn out well for Stanley, Stella, and Blanche. And the fact that the men reconvene to play another round of poker at the end of the film seems to accentuate the fact that the divide between men and women has only widened by story’s end.

It is interesting to look back at the way poker was not-so-flatteringly represented in this signature story of mid-century America -- as a game not only reserved primarily for men (and thus a source for division between men and women), but also perhaps an arena in which players might readily indulge their most “primitive” tendencies.

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, September 02, 2011

Epic Poker League Redux: Second Series Begins Today

from the Epic Poker League's inaugural main eventToday begins the second tournament series of the Epic Poker League’s Season 1.

This second series kicks off in a half-hour or so with the second $1,500 buy-in “Pro/Am” event, a three-day event (with two Day 1s). The top nine finishers win spots in the $20,000 buy-in Main Event that starts next Tuesday. In addition to that Main Event -- an eight-handed no-limit hold’em tourney this time (unlike the six-handed tourney they played last month) -- this second series also includes another charity tourney as well as a one-day, $2K “Turbo Event.”

Unlike back in August when the tournament circuit calendar was relatively free of potential conflicts, those eligible to play in next week’s EPL Main Event will be choosing between heading over to the Palms or perhaps going a number of other places next week to play.

The World Poker Tour Grand Prix de Paris event will be happening next week, as will a WSOP Circuit event (in Louisiana) and the UKIPT Dublin event. And right around the corner is the Partouche Poker Tour’s Main Event, for which some who go for the WPT Paris tourney will surely stick around. There’s also the World Championship of Online Poker starting up this weekend over at PokerStars for which anyone wanting to play is going to have to do so from outside the United States.

The list of eligible players continues to grow as more players meet the EPL qualifying criteria. Back in May when the initial Season 1 roster was announced, there were 217 names listed (plus Annie Duke, who as EPL Commissioner is not playing in the main events). By August 1, the list had grown to 251 players (again, plus Duke) thanks to WSOP cashes having made several new players eligible. Randy Dorfman was added about a week later following a review of his cashes, making the total 252 heading into that first EPL tourney series.

Today the EPL’s current list of league qualified players shows 260 are now listed (plus Duke). The extra eight -- Jeremiah DeGreef, Dan Fleyshman, Sean Getzwiller, George Long, Brandon Meyers, Steve O’Dwyer, Micah Raskin, and Clifford Waite -- all earned cards for the rest of Season 1 by virtue of final tabling the first Pro/Am event and winning their way into the first ME. (Andy Bloch also made that first Pro/Am final table, but he already had a two-year card.)

A total of 137 played that first EPL Main Event, including the aforementioned eight who won seats via the Pro/Am. I think it’s safe to assume that Andy Bloch probably would’ve played the Main Event whether or not he’d won his way in, so we can say 129 of the 252 players who could have played that first ME did. Next week there will be 260 players who can play, with (probably) seven or eight or nine who couldn’t otherwise play winning their way in via the Pro/Am.

There will be a lot of attention given to the final turnout and how it compares to the 137 that played the first ME. That figure -- which I took to be a fairly decent-sized field, all things considered -- was variously viewed as a “success” by some and something less than that by others.

Of course, when it comes to the well-being of the EPL and its prospects going forward, there’s a lot that matters that doesn’t have much at all to do with turnouts. Certainly an especially small field or a much-bigger-than-expected one will be meaningful, but it is the behind-the-scenes stuff (e.g., the courting of sponsors and other possible projects) that are probably of more importance than how many play.

Still, I’m as curious as anyone to see what happens next week.

Stella!I’ve also become more excited about the EPL blog where I’m getting to post occasionally. The most recent entry in my “Community Cards: Poker in Pop Culture” column went out earlier this week and has to do with the role of poker in the 1951 film A Streetcar Named Desire. For those of you who haven't seen the film, that picture to the left shows Marlon Brando as Stanley Kowalski moments after missing a flush draw.

If you do happen to check out the column, let me know what you think. ’Cos, you know, whoever you are, I have always depended on the kindness of strangers.

Labels: , ,


Older Posts

Copyright © 2006-2021 Hard-Boiled Poker.
All Rights Reserved.