By the time of his passing in 2008, Newman had appeared in over 60 films, with America’s favorite card game popping up in more than a few of them. As a result, Newman came to be identified somewhat with the game. In fact, among the many quotes often attributed to the actor is a poker-related one which anyone reading this post will undoubtedly recognize:
“If you’re playing a poker game and you look around the table and can’t tell who the sucker is, it’s you.”
So Newman is thought to have said, although the line likely had its origins elsewhere. Whatever its true source, it’s a line fans of poker films recognize instantly as paraphrased by Mike McDermott during the opening of Rounders (1998): “If you can’t spot the sucker in the first half-hour at the table, then you are the sucker.”
The actor was himself not an especially dedicated poker player, at least not according to his biographer Shawn Levy. “Despite the evidence of his film work,” writes Levy, “he played pool and poker passingly to badly; chess too.” Rather did Newman prefer bridge, says Levy, spending down time on sets “working out bridge hands silently in his head.”
As the stubborn, intrepid inmate in Cool Hand Luke, it’s a game of five-card stud that helps Newman’s Luke earn a certain status among the other prisoners, as well as his nickname. In the hand, several disinterested-and-thus-super-strong-appearing raises from Luke ultimately force his opponent to fold his “pair of Savannahs” (or sevens), at which point Luke reveals his king-high. Or, as observer Dragline (George Kennedy) gleefully crows, “a hand full of nothing.”
“Yeah, well,” says Luke, pausing just a beat while opening a bottle, “sometimes nothing can be a real cool hand.” In just three minutes, Luke’s complicated character is comprehensively defined both to the other prisoners and to us via a simple hand of poker.
The Sting found Newman teamed with Robert Redford as a pair of Depression-era grifters out to score revenge on a large scale against a hated mob boss named Lonnegan. Along the way, the twisty, surprise-filled plot places Newman's Gondorff on a cross-country train across the poker table from their enemy in private, high-stakes game.
Playing five-card draw, the villain Lonnegan has a deck prepared to ensure Gondorff receives quad treys versus his own four nines. Yet when the betting concludes, it is Gondorff who surprisingly turns over the best hand -- four jacks -- to the disbelief of Lonnegan, his accomplice in deceit, as well as the audience.
Adapted from Larry McMurtry’s novel, Hud finds Newman as the irascible title character, a woman-chasing man in his mid-30s growing increasingly uncomfortable with a life working on his father’s cattle farm. A family drama in which Newman plays an antagonist pitted against his father and nephew, relationships are further complicated by the presence of their housekeeper, Alma, played by Patricia Neal in an Oscar-winning performance.
Midway through the film comes a sexually-charged meeting between Hud and Alma during which she explains how her ex-husband was a gambler whom she now suspects is probably working as a dealer in Reno or Las Vegas. In fact, Alma has just come from a poker game herself where she left a winner. Hud asks her “how much you take the boys for tonight,” her ability as a player clearly increasing his fascination with her.
While Newman doesn’t play poker in Hud, he does in another western, The Life and Times of Judge Roy Bean (1972). Though loosely based on a true story, the strange, uneven film plays out like a fantasy with a sequence of oddball episodes featuring Newman’s eccentric Bean surrounded by a cast of oddballs.
The judge frequently holds court over poker games, said by one of the marshals who narrates part of the story as having “had as much to do with winning the West as Colts .45 or the Prairie schooner.” Indeed, poker is described as “more a religion, than a game,” with Bean believing himself “a past master.”
That said, the games shown in the film serve mainly to show Bean to be a losing player, though nonetheless confirm his authority over his dusty kingdom. For example, after losing a hand to one of his marshals, Whorehouse Lucky Jim, the Judge immediately charges him $25 for the next beer he orders.
“That ain’t sportin’,” complains Jim. “What is a man supposed to do?” “Start losing or quit drinking,” declares Bean.
One last poker game precedes a final battle between Bean and a rival to his authority. As if to foreshadow the gunplay to come, the players use bullets for chips. “I open for a .38,” says one. “I call the .38 and raise you two .45s.” It perhaps goes without saying that when the end comes for Bean his demise is reported thusly: “the judge cashed in his chips.”
Finally, Newman again found himself at a poker table in Nobody’s Fool (1994), a smart, occasionally moving film that probably deserves a wider audience. There Newman plays yet another against-the-grain type in Sully Sullivan, a freelance construction worker struggling to get by in wintry upstate New York.
Whether by luck or otherwise, Carl beats Sully in their game, and appears to be beating him in life, too, having married the beautiful Toby (Melanie Griffith) -- with whom Sully openly flirts -- though Carl is cheating on her with a succession of secretaries.
Meanwhile, Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays force Sully to consider whether he ought to try to amend what has been a life as a neglectful father and grandfather, with the subsequent development of that primary plot providing both an absorbing story and opportunity for Newman to shine in a particularly well-fitting role.
Sully gets another crack at Carl in a later poker game, by which point his change in character has taken place. Things go better for him there, but when others mention his luck turning, he insists “luck has nothing to do with it.”
There’s at least one other film of Newman’s in which poker does take place, although only in passing -- The Hustler (1961). Nonetheless, in his 1977 book of essays Total Poker, David Spanier provocatively suggests The Hustler to be “the best film about poker,” even though “it isn’t about poker at all.”
Pointing out how the story of the pool-player Fast Eddie constitutes “probably the definitive statement about winning and losing in games, if not in life,” Spanier believes the movie to provide cinema’s most cogent commentary on poker without even focusing on the actual game.
“Although The Hustler is about pool, its lessons apply just as strongly, indeed precisely, to poker,” argues Spanier.
Can’t really blame Spanier too much for thinking of poker while watching a Paul Newman movie, even one in which poker isn’t being played. After all, the guy always seemed to have cards in his hand.