I guess this means I have to revise my whole blind/ante structure now. :)
Actually missing a day is no biggie... we’ll be able to catch up without much difficulty, I imagine. I have completed the syllabus and since some have expressed interest I thought I’d share a list of the reading/viewing assignments. Right now it appears I’ll be able to teach the class again after this semester, so as we move through these units this spring I’ll be thinking about which assignments I want to keep and what other ones I might want to include next time around.
Unit 1: Origins, Rules, and Variants
This first unit -- just covering the first few classes -- introduces poker as a subject worthy of academic study as well as a lens through which we can examine numerous aspects of American culture from the early 19th century to the present.
David Mamet, “The Things Poker Teaches Us” (essay, 1982) John Lukacs, “Poker and the American Character” (essay, 1963) James McManus, Cowboys Full, (history, 2009), chapters 1-5, 17, 18, 32
The Mamet essay (which I mentioned at the end of yesterday’s post) sounds a few general notes about poker that we’ll return to throughout the semester. Mamet concludes that poker teaches us “character,” so the Lukacs piece will follow-up on that idea a bit by more specifically talking about “American Character.” (I wrote at length about the Lukacs essay a few months back here and here.) Then the first chapter of McManus’s book -- in which he spells out his plan to talk about how poker is interwoven in “American DNA” -- will also give us a number of things to look for going forward.
The next few McManus chapters then talk about all of those games like “mus” and “primiera” and “as nas” and “poque” that can be regarded as poker’s precursors. The later chapters talk about draw poker, stud poker, and hold’em, and that’s where we’ll make sure everybody at least knows the rules to these games before going forward.
As I mentioned last week, Cowboys Full is kind of a “core” text for the class, especially here in the early going. Here’s my review of McManus’s history from the fall of 2009 when the book first appeared.
Unit 2: The History of Poker
These couple of weeks the class will mainly be a history class, and we’ll primarily be sticking with McManus’s version of the story of poker in the U.S., although here I’m bringing in Spanier to supplement things a bit as well as to introduce another voice into the discussion. I’m a big fan of Spanier’s collection, by the way (reviewed here). The Hildreth excerpt presents the first instance of the word “poker” appearing in print.
McManus, Cowboys Full, chapters 6-16, 19-22, 24, 26, 28-30, 33, 34 James Hildreth, excerpt from Dragoon Campaigns (memoir, 1836) David Spanier, Total Poker, (essays, 1977), chapter 2 (“Origins”) and chapter 3 (“Presidents and Poker”)
We’ll basically be carrying the story up through the middle of the 20th century, covering poker’s spread across America in saloons and on riverboats, Civil War poker, the stories of Wild Bill Hickok and other characters from the Old West, and notable anecdotes involving presidents and poker. We’ll also look at McManus’s observations about poker’s relevance during the World Wars, Vietnam, and the Cold War.
Unit 3: The Culture of Poker
We start this unit by backtracking a little to revisit the idea that poker was formerly “the cheating game” in America (with Blackbridge and Devol), before later (with Yardley) becoming a “square game.” The McManus chapters provide more background and detail regarding Yardley’s interesting story, including about his experience as a codebreaker for the U.S. government. (I wrote a bit about Yardley’s landmark -- and best-selling -- poker text here.)
John Blackbridge, excerpt from Practical Guide Book (strategy, 1880) George Devol, excerpt from Forty Years a Gambler on the Mississippi (memoir, 1887) Herbert O. Yardley, excerpt from The Education of a Poker Player (strategy/memoir, 1957) McManus, Cowboys Full, chapters 23, 25, 27
Then we move into some other readings that help illustrate the “culture of poker” in the U.S. from 1950s to present.
Here we’ll start out talking about the birth of Las Vegas, move into the California Poker scene, then read and discuss the World Series of Poker. McManus writes about all three, of course, so we’ll be dipping back into Cowboys Full for the relevant chapters.
McManus, Cowboys Full, chapters 31, 35-40 Spanier, Total Poker, chapter 5 (“Breakfast in Vegas”) David Hayano, excerpt from Poker Faces (anthropological study, 1982) Dick Miles, “Lowball in a Time Capsule” (article, 1967) Jon Bradshaw, excerpt from Fast Company (essays, 1975) Paul McGuire, excerpt from Lost Vegas (memoir/history, 2010) Al Alvarez, The Biggest Game in Town (history, 1983)
McManus and Spanier will help us talk about the early days of Vegas, including that big game at Binion’s between Johnny Moss and Nick “the Greek” Dandalos. Hayano and Miles provide a lot of background for those Gardena games (material that will then get dramatized with that cool opening of California Split the students will watch later).
The excerpt from Bradshaw (reviewed here) concerns the 1973 WSOP, and from Dr. Pauly’s book I’ve chosen chapter 35 (from the 2008 WSOP). Then we’ll read Alvarez’s great account of the 1981 WSOP, a book that includes a lot of insightful commentary about Vegas and American culture.
Unit 4: Poker in Culture -- Literature
As I’ll explain to the class, it will begin as a history course, then here will turn into a literature class (before becoming a film course, then a class in sociology or even psychology). Here we’ll consider literary texts in which poker is of special thematic importance. Actually, we’ll be finishing Alvarez at the start of this unit, which kind of fits as I consider The Biggest Game in Town a literary triumph as well as an exemplary piece of journalism.
Mark Twain, “The Professor’s Yarn” (story from Life on the Mississippi, 1882) Stephen Crane, “A Poker Game” (story, 1900) Bertolt Brecht, “Four Men and a Poker Game, or Too Much Luck is Bad Luck” (story, 1926) James Thurber, “Everything is Wild” (story, 1932) Robert McLaughlin, “Let’s Get Rid of the Ribbon Clerks” (story, 1945) John Updike, “Poker Night” (story, 1987) Jesse May, Shut Up and Deal (novel, 1998)
All of the stories appear in the 2004 anthology Read ‘Em and Weep edited by John Stravinsky. I think it will be especially interesting to read them along with May’s novel after having learned about poker’s history in such detail. There are a number of other texts I might’ve included here (such as Rick Bennet’s King of a Small World which I talked about here a few weeks ago), and I imagine in later iterations of the course I’ll likely substitute some of those to see how the students respond.
By the way, Tim Peters discussed Shut Up and Deal way back on Episode 2 of The Hard-Boiled Poker Radio Show, if you want to hear more about the novel.
Unit 5: Poker in Culture -- Film
Just three required films here, although as I said last week I’ll probably concoct an assignment that allows students to choose other films to write about if they wish. I also plan to show a lot of clips from various films along the way all semester to help illustrate various themes and issues suggested by the readings, so film will be a prominent part of the course throughout.
The Cincinnati Kid (film, dir. Norman Jewison, 1965) Spanier, Total Poker, chapter 5 (“Movies”) Anthony Holden, Big Deal (memoir/history), chapter 4 (“Read ‘Em and Weep”) California Split (film, dir. Robert Altman, 1974) Joseph Walsh, excerpt from Gambler on the Loose (memoir, 2008) Rounders (film, dir. John Dahl, 1998)
For the film unit, I wanted us to focus on what I consider well made films that really use a lot of the poker-related ideas and themes that we will have read about for the previous weeks by the time we view them. The readings here are supplemental, with Spanier and Holden both commenting on The Cincinnati Kid and Split screenwriter Walsh telling stories about his relationship with Elliott Gould and the making of that film. (See here for more on Walsh’s book.)
Looking back, I realize I have never really written a great deal about Rounders here on the blog, although it has obviously come up frequently. I wrote a full-fledged review of Altman’s California Split, a film I admire a lot. And I devoted a series of posts long ago to The Cincinnati Kid, including a review, a "commentary on the commentary" from the DVD, a discussion of Richard Jessup’s original 1964 novel, and an analysis of differences between the endings of the novel and the film. (That last one contains spoilers, dontcha know!)
Unit 6: Poker in Culture -- Gender Roles, Morality, Law, Technology
I’ve kind of jumbled the order of these readings here a bit, but you get the idea -- kind of a miscellany of topics with which to close out the semester.
Spanier, Total Poker, chapter 6 (“Loving and Losing”) and chapter 10 (“Morals”); and “Net Poker” (essay from The Hand I Played, 2001) McManus, Cowboys Full, chapters 45, 48, 49 Barbara Connors, “Power Play” (from Women’s Poker Night, essay, 2007) Mark Twain, “Science vs. Luck” (story, 1870) Barbara Tuchman, “A Game, Gentlemen, A Game...” (essay, 1966) William J. Florence, excerpt from The Gentleman’s Handbook on Poker (strategy, 1890) Roger Dunstan, “History of Gambling in the United States” (history, 1997) Martin Harris, “Laak-Eslami Team Defeats Polaris in Man-Machine Poker Championship” (article, 2007)
We’ll first talk about men, women, so-called “gender roles,” and the like, using Spanier, a chapter from McManus, and Connors’s essay from Women’s Poker Night (a book I reviewed here). Then we’ll have one class where we get into the whole “luck-vs.-skill” debate (with Twain and Tuchman), which I think will be relevant to the subsequent discussion of morality which will begin with another chapter from Spanier and that old strategy bit from Florence.
We’ll then talk a bit about gambling laws in the U.S., reading Dunstan’s historical overview and McManus’s UIGEA commentary. Then we’ll end the course talking about online poker, poker “bots,” and artificial intelligence, using another of Spanier’s essays (from The Hand I Played), some more from McManus, and my little report from one of the Polaris matches.
Students will write three essays along the way as well as take two exams. Like I say, I do plan to make some changes for the next time I teach the course. I also expect to learn a lot from my students, too, about these texts and the issues we discuss. Don’t really plan right now on writing too much here on Hard-Boiled Poker about the class, although I imagine I will bring it up from time to time.
Wish me luck. Or skill. Or both.